Mita
The copier-only company — glory and fall
MITA
“One Thing On Our Mind,” the 1989 American television campaign promised, and Mita meant it: no cameras, no calculators, no fax sidelines — copiers only. In 1992 that single-mindedness held 10.3 per cent of the market, fourth in the world. This review covers the machines. The accountancy gets its own crosshead overleaf, and has earned it.
Osaka, 1934: Shigeo Mita founds a business dealing in diazo blue-line printing, incorporated as a joint-stock company in 1948. By the eighties his firm had become the copier industry’s one true specialist. Canon made cameras, Sharp made calculators, Ricoh made more or less everything; Mita Industrial Co., Ltd. made copiers, full stop, and built its entire identity on the fact. Dealer folklore of the period held that this was precisely why you bought one — the company that does only one thing is the company that has become expert at it.
The positioning was global and loud. American viewers got the “One Thing On Our Mind” spots in 1989 (the jingle remembered as “Mita — is it!” belongs to the same era, though its exact wording goes unverified by our research department). British football crowds got it across Aston Villa’s chest from 1983 — see Plate No. 7 overleaf. Behind the advertising sat a genuinely big machine: roughly US$1.2 billion in worldwide sales, subsidiaries everywhere (Mita Copystar America from 1973), and that 1992 share of 10.3 per cent — fourth behind Canon (29.1), Sharp (20.6) and Xerox (13.4), and ahead of Toshiba.
The machines themselves were marathon runners. A 1979 Copystar DC-15 — 15 cpm, analog, A3 — would still be making copies in Luxembourg in 2008, winning the successor company’s own longevity competition against a field that included a Mita 600D and DC-131 of 1980 and a DC-121 of 1982. Our research department reports this from the far side of the decade and asks that it be entered as evidence of character.
Through the nineties the DC analog line ran from an 18 cpm entry unit to the 92 cpm DC-9285 flagship, with duplex standard from mid-range up — several models even shipped with duplex switched on by default, an unusually early paper-saving stance. And in the middle of that range sat the machine below: the one this magazine has personal history with, drawn here with the care it is owed.
Mita — The Range, 1990–2000
| Model | Year | CPM | Notable |
|---|---|---|---|
| DC-1820 / DC-2360 | unv. | 18 / 23 | Entry and workgroup analogs, optional sorter |
| DC-3060 | unv. | 30 | 25 cpm even in duplex |
| DC-4090 | unv. | 40 | Standard duplex; 34 cpm two-sided |
| DC-4685F | unv. | 46 | Ships with duplex switched ON by default |
| DC-5090 | unv. | 50 | 2-in-1/4-in-1 combination; shares developer with DC-6500 |
| DC-5590 | unv. | 55 | High-volume line, sorter/stapler |
| DC-6500 | mid 90s | 65 | Plate No. 6; staple sorter, 6,300-sheet supply |
| DC-6590 / 6595 | unv. | 65 | The 6500’s siblings; 6595 holds 55 cpm in duplex |
| DC-7090 | unv. | 70 | Departmental high-volume, finisher |
| DC-8090 / 8095 / 8585 | unv. | 80 / 85 | Print-room class; 8095 holds 68 cpm in duplex |
| DC-9285 | unv. | 92 | Flagship — 92 cpm, 78 cpm duplex |
| AI-3030 / AI-5555 | late 90s | 30 / 55 | “AI” digital MFP line; 5555 does 46 cpm duplex |
| CI7500 | late 90s | 23 | Mita’s colour multifunction entry |
Speeds verified against the EPA Energy Star-era dataset. Launch years the record does not support are marked honestly.
August 1998: the fall
Mita Industrial filed for protection under Japan’s Corporate Rehabilitation Law in August 1998, and then it got worse. The court-appointed administrator found the books window-dressed since around 1986 — the entire “one thing on our mind” glory era ran partly on fictitious profits. Yoshihiro Mita, the founder’s son and president since 1979, drew a suspended sentence from the Osaka High Court in November 2000: ¥140 million in executive bonuses across five unprofitable years, ¥1.13 billion in unlawful dividends (his own family among the recipients), and the bribing of an auditor. The collapse is commonly called the largest failure of a Japanese manufacturer to that date; the liabilities figure often quoted near ¥200 billion is one our research department could not verify, so it does not appear here. Mita would have appreciated the discipline.
The supplier saves the customer
The rescue was as strange as the fall. The courts appointed Kyocera — Mita’s own supplier of ceramic and electronic components — as rehabilitation sponsor, with printer-division director Koji Seki as trustee through October 1999 and roughly ¥12 billion injected. In January 2000 Mita was reborn as Kyocera Mita Corporation: Ecosys page-printer technology bolted onto Mita’s copier engines and worldwide dealer channel. The trustee had named the fatal gap plainly: engines and a channel, but no digital printer technology of its own. The copier-only bet made the brand; when the digital MFP arrived, it broke the company.
THE VERDICT — MITA
The purest copier company that ever lived, whose machines outlasted the firm itself — a 1979 model was still working in 2008, which is more than can be said for the balance sheet after 1986.
Three ways to buy the only product they made
Eleven DC-badged analogs from 18 to 92 copies a minute, every one A3, every one a copier and nothing else — the purest range in this magazine. When a company has one thing on its mind, the ladder is the company. Here is where the money went.
The entry ticket
The ladder starts at the DC-1820 — 18 cpm, feeder and sorter both on the options list, and registered under the Energy Star programme back when that made a brochure paragraph. One rung up, the DC-2360 gives the small office 23 cpm and the same options. These went to the church office, the two-partner practice, the school front desk — buyers who would meet one Mita, learn its noises, and keep it past several governments.
Against Sharp’s SF-2022 — the 1992 twentieth-anniversary model at 22 cpm, likewise optional feeder and sorter — the machines are near-twins. The difference was the handshake: the Sharp dealer also sold calculators; the Mita dealer sold copiers, full stop, and made sure you noticed the stop.
The engine room
The mid-range is where the house doctrine shows. The DC-3060 does 30 cpm and, unusually, still holds 25 with the paper turning over. The DC-4090 makes duplex standard and holds 34. And the DC-4685F, 46 cpm, ships with duplex switched ON from the factory — the machine assumes two sides, and single-sided copying is the setting you must go looking for. In an era when most makers sold the duplex unit as an accessory, Mita sold it as a worldview.
The named rival here is Canon’s NP-6030 of 1992, 30 cpm, a fine ecological citizen with the duplex unit sitting politely on its options sheet. Canon sold you the second side; Mita assumed you would come round eventually and saved everyone the meeting. The legal practice running double-sided bundles all afternoon knew which philosophy it was billing for.
The summit
Above 50 the range earns its finishing. The DC-5590 brings 55 cpm with sorter and stapler; the DC-8095 does 80 and still holds 68 in duplex; the DC-9285 crowns the line at 92 cpm, 78 two-sided. And in the middle of them sits the DC-6500 — 65 cpm of touch-panel confidence with 6,300 sheets in the bunker — a machine about which this magazine has already said quite enough on p. —, except to note that the whole tier orbits it.
The comparison that matters is Xerox’s 1090: 92 cpm, staples to 50 sheets, automatic duplex — and a 1985 launch date, a decade’s head start and litigation-legend status included. The DC-9285 answers the number and holds 78 with the paper turning; the print room choosing between them was choosing between a reputation and a duplex habit. Both, the record suggests, ran forever.
If you bought one — the shortlist, 1996
| Model | Tier | Why |
|---|---|---|
| DC-2360 | The entry ticket | 23 cpm for the small office; options as needed, decades of service likely whether requested or not |
| DC-4685F | The engine room | 46 cpm, duplex ON out of the crate — the paper bill halves before anyone reads the manual |
| DC-6500 | The summit | 65 cpm, staple sorter, 6,300-sheet supply; see the review — the pitch survived a thirty-year audit |
Head to head — the departmental floor
| Mita DC-6500 | Canon NP-6060 | Xerox 5065 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed | 65 cpm | 60 cpm | ~62–65 cpm (unv.) |
| Feeder | ADF | ADF | ADF |
| Finishing | Staple sorter | Sorter | Sorter/stapler (unv.) |
| The call | Three analog consoles within five copies a minute of one another; only one has a touch panel, 6,300 sheets in reserve and a sorter that definitely staples. The Xerox may staple too — the record is coy. | ||
The summit — DC-9285 v Xerox 1090
| Mita DC-9285 | Xerox 1090 (1985) | |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | 92 cpm · 78 cpm duplex | 92 cpm |
| Feeder | ADF | Semi/full auto document handler |
| Finishing | Finisher | Staples to 50 sheets; auto duplex |
| The call | A dead heat at 92 — except the Xerox posted the number in 1985 and became a copy-shop legend, while the Mita answers a decade on by holding 78 with the paper turning over. A head start versus a habit. | |
The duplex party — DC-4685F v SF-2050
| Mita DC-4685F | Sharp SF-2050 | |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | 46 cpm | 50 cpm |
| Feeder | ADF | RADF (unv.) |
| Finishing | Sorter | Sorter/stapler options |
| The call | The decade’s two machines that shipped with duplex switched ON. The Sharp is four copies a minute quicker; the Mita belongs to a range where two sides is the factory setting from 40 cpm up. Either way the office contrarian single-sides by hand. | |
BUYING ADVICE, 1990s
Buy from the company with one thing on its mind — the machines demonstrably outlast the company, the shirt sponsorship and the auditor’s patience. Take the duplex default as found, and insist on the staple sorter.